Ron Paul’s Ascent Cannot Be Separated from His Foreign-Policy Views

“As the only remaining GOP candidate who is skeptical of America’s interventionist foreign policy and against the prospect of future wars of choice in the Middle East — positions held by perhaps half of rank-and-file Republicans — Ron Paul naturally owes an important part of his popularity to his positions on those issues, which distinguish him from the rest of the party’s field. Strangely, however, I keep seeing pieces ostensibly grappling with Paul’s popularity that completely and inexplicably discount his foreign-policy views.” (SOURCE)

Does the whole world would rejoice in the killing of millions of innocent people?

I don’t and I personally don’t know anyone that does, but I guess there are some who may? It is really is time to start changing the conversation and look at things from a different perspective. If wars worked, wouldn’t wars end quickly and peace then prevail?

If people thought that way, wars could come to end very quickly, but because wars don’t work at all, those profiting from them, the banks that finance them and the military/industrial complex, will extend them and foment new ones. That’s what happens when your representatives are bribed through special interests to rig the game.

For most people living peacefully among each other and trading values through free and fair trade, killing doesn’t work in furthering the expression and expansion of life, which is what life is all about.

Even if we don’t agree with others or express the same beliefs, we can still get along and respect each other peacefully l if we look at life through a “what works vs. what doesn’t work” perspective. This is part and parcel of Ron Paul’s foreign policy, and when more and more people understand this (as Thomas Jefferson, George Washington and other founders did) the more people will come to realize that foreign policy is one of Ron Paul’s strongest attributes.

Well it is about damned time……. When our representatives that took an oath to OBEY and protect the Constitution repeatedly break that oath by voting FOR laws or bills that anyone that understands the simple language in our Constitution, it is our Duty to remove them from office by any ethical and moral means available.

The Issue of Federal Official Recall Has Never Reached the Federal Courts.

“Montana is one of nine states with provisions that say that the right of recall extends to recalling members of its federal congressional delegation, pursuant to Montana Code 2-16-603, on the grounds of physical or mental lack of fitness, incompetence, violation of oath of office, official misconduct, or conviction of certain felony offenses.” (SOURCE)

The operative language “violation of oath of office” applies here. We have nine states that can start a snowball of recalls to at least remove and ostracize or better convict these traitors to “we the people” and the nation.

The fact is, “we the people” can go further in the other 49 states by influencing our state U.S. Supreme Courts Grand Juries to subpoena these traitors, in their home states, to determine whether laws have been broken. We just need a few constitutional lawyers to get the ball rolling. No need for petitions or other legal mumbo jumbo. Once a grand jury has determined that laws have been broken, the trials can commence.