Eugene Garner is a retired Aerospace engineer (rocket scientist) that worked to make reality do our bidding. He retired in disgust seeing all the evil perpetrated in the world under the guise of national security. He learned quickly that secrecy and classified information is only to prevent “we the people” from learning what is being done in their name. If it is secret, you know they’re up to no good.
In retirement he turned his interests to the study of America history, the Constitution and our Founding Fathers. What he has found is that we been defrauded, lied to, cheated and betrayed by the very elected representatives that violated their oath of office to obey and protect the Constitution.
This is not new, since although there have been elements that have been at odds with our Constitution from the beginning, the real destruction began accelerating in 1913 and have led us to this sorry state today.
It is long past due that we rid the professional politicians that work for the corporate/banking oligarchies and spurn their employers (We the People), and replace them with patriots that will honor their oath of office and will work to restore our Constitution and system of checks and balances that brought this great county to the respectable economic status it once commanded.
We must lead by the example of peace, free trade and collaboration with our neighbors, not exploitation, war and terrorism.
What I wouldnt give to have a debate with you about this. You just say so many things that come from nowhere that Im pretty sure Id have a fair shot. Your blog is great visually, I mean people wont be bored. But others who can see past the videos and the layout wont be so impressed with your generic understanding of this topic.
Bring it on. I have done enough research that I can verify anything posted with a preponderance of evidence. Feel free to post on my site and I will debate. I would enjoy that and maybe we could open more eyes regarding the truth we are up against.
gene
This is my first visit to your blog. We are starting a new initiative in the same niche as this blog. Your blog provided us with important information to work on. You have done a admirable job.
If you don’t mind me asking I just wanted to get the scoop on what is the difference between blogenenigne and wordpress blogs? Is it easier to use or more efficient? I amseeing a lot of blogs powered by this software popping up lately and wondering if it is better or not? Thanks…
couldn’t tell you…..only use wordpress2
gene
I read your articles and get a lot of info that I never know before. It’s hard to find knowledgeable people on this topic, but you sound like you know what you’re talking about!
Very interesting Gene. Facts and truth given. Knowing you for over 23 years from aerospace engineering days to present times, I know you ring true! This needs to get to Washington, DC frequently.
Hello Eugene,
Awesome site, wish we had this in Australia, maybe hinder / prevent the slide down to where you guys sadly are. Maybe we should join forces. I hope you are the right person to talk to. I watched the Ton Woods interview on nullification and what really irks me and I find massively distractionary when trying to listen to what is being said mis that annoying, “piss me off ” in Aussie speak jangle of bell noise (note noise not music)that dominates the interview. Is there any way of removing this as it is totally counter-productive. I actually believe it is costing you viewers which is not what you want. Let me know your thoughts pls. Cheers and keep up your fabulous and long overdue website, Frederick
Hi Frederick,
Thank you for your input. I agree, a lot of videos have crap for background noise. I really am not a techie with this stuff and have no clue on whether one could change the audio???
In my research I get the impression that Australia is going through some of the same ’slide’ into a NWO oligarchy. That appears to be the overall plan of the parasites that control money.
Again, thanks for comments, wish more people could (or would) add insight as you have. I can’t answer everyone’s comments (too many) but I’ll bust my butt to answer questions and dialogue.
gene
I detest this war in Afghanistan. When is it ever going to be over? Seems like another Vietnam to me.
Great insight…what a knowledgeable dude…click on the ads
This behavior is fully in keeping with the ultramilitaristic ideology of a regime that remains publicly committed to uniting the peninsula by force: “Reunification is at the ends of our bayonets,” as the omnipresent slogan in the North goes.
Hey Eugene. I like what you are trying to accomplish here with this website. I recently became aware of the attack on our Constitution through the chain of events following the recent change in format of a social media platform called Meetup.com. I became extremely disturbed when I found out that CEO’s of major corporations like Google were being backed by the State Dept. and in bed with founders of social media sites like Facebook, Twitter and Meetup with plans to force humanity into a socialist form of global government. That they are using social media to overthrow governments across the globe in Northern Africa and now in European nations as well as funding attacks on democracy here in the US via Union strikes. I would like to put you two in contact with each other as you may be able to help one another in one way or another. Please email me if you are interested.
Spencer(?),
the worm hole of deceit and corruption is deep.
I would be more than honored to work with freedom loving individuals.
We need to get the truth out….once enough individuals are aware of facts of the oligarchy of banksters/big Corp that run the show we can overcome and restore sanity and our constitutional republic.
Your ideas?
Yes, the hole is deep, wide, ugly.
THE DECLINE OF AMERICA AS A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC AND THE REBIRTH OF AMERICA AS A CORPORATE REPUBLIC.
The United States was originally created as a Constitutional Republic, however it has gradually became a Corporate Republic. ______Some of our elected officials in the legislature have taken it upon themselves to redefine the definition (meaning) of the United States from being a Constitutional Republic to that of a Federal Corporation.
TITLE 28 > PART VI > CHAPTER 176 > SUBCHAPTER A > § 3002
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
We, the people, need to take a good look at the difference of how a Constitutional Republic and a Corporate Republic is structured and then take a good look at how congress has been governing this country lately.
Constitutional Republic is a state where the head of state and other officials are representatives of the people and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government’s power over citizens. In a constitutional republic, executive, legislative, and judicial powers are separated into distinct branches. The fact that a constitution exists that limits the government’s power makes the state constitutional. That the head(s) of state and other officials are chosen by election, rather than inheriting their positions, and that their decisions are subject to judicial review makes a state republican
Corporate Republic is a theoretical form of government occasionally hypothesized in works of science fiction, though some historical nations such as medieval Florence might be said to have been governed as corporate republics. While retaining some semblance of republican government, a corporate republic would be run primarily like a business, involving a board of directors and executives. Utilities, including hospitals, schools, the army, and the police force, would be privatized. The social welfare function carried out by the state is instead carried out by corporations in the form of benefits to employees. Although corporate republics do not exist officially in the modern world, they are often used in works of fiction or political commentary as a warning of the perceived dangers of unbridled capitalism. In such works, they usually arise when a single, vastly powerful corporation deposes a weak government, over time or in a coup d’état.
Note the words “privatized” (privatization) and “unbridled capitalism” they are a key part of a corporate republic.
Next time one watches the news , one should actually note how many times our elected official use the words the government is to large. The government needs to turn over some of its agencies to the private sector, the private sector knows how to run them better than the government.
________________________________________________________________________
Restructuring Local Government
Privatization
“Privatization is a worldwide phenomenon. In recent years all levels of government, seeking to reduce costs, have begun turning to the private sector to provide some of the services that are ordinarily provided by government. The spread of the privatization movement is grounded in the fundamental belief that market competition in the private sector is a more efficient way to provide these services and allows for greater citizen choice. In practice, however, concerns about service quality, social equity, and employment conditions raise skepticism of privatization. In New York State, labor concerns are also a major issue. Although empirical studies do not provide clear evidence on the costs and benefits of privatization, public perception and pressure for improved government efficiency will keep privatization on the government agenda…“
(RE: Cornell University.)
What does Quasi-governmental agencies have to do with government and the private sector?
Congress created agencies under a new form of government within the government known as the quasi-government. Congress gave these agencies ‘quasi- legislative’ and/or ‘quasi-judicial’ powers as well as autonomy in operations, in order to allow these agencies to breach the private sector as a matter of principle rather than by law.
CRS Report for Congress Order Code RL30533
Time will tell whether the emergence of the quasi government is to be viewed as a symptom of decline in our democratic government, or a harbinger of a new, creative management era where the purported artificial barriers between the governmental and private sectors are breached as a matter of principle. . . .
How is quasi-government defined?
Order Code RL30533
“…The Quasi Government: Hybrid Organizations with Both Government and Private Sector Legal Characteristics…”
What is the definition of quasi-legislative and/or quasi-judicial?
Legal Dictionary
Main Entry: quasi–legislative
Function: adjective
: of, relating to, or being an administrative act, body, or procedure that is concerned with the promulgation of rules and regulations or the adoption of laws, charters, or orders and that is based on authority derived from the legislature by statute quasi–legislative decisions — In re Investigation of Unfair Election Practice Objections , 451 North Western Reporter, Second Series 49 (1990
“[J]udicial or quasi-judicial proceedings are defined broadly to include all kinds of truth-seeking proceedings, including administrative, legislative and other official proceedings.”
What did the Attorney General say about ‘quasi- legislative’ and/or ‘quasi-judicial’ agencies?
The Attorney General has stated:
Agencies have no inherent lawmaking powers. They are not creatures of the Constitution. . . . This means we should abandon the idea that there are such things as ‘quasi- legislative’ or ‘quasi-judicial’ functions that can be properly delegated to independent agencies or bodies. . . .
. . . [F]ederal agencies performing executive functions are themselves properly agents of the executive. They are not ‘quasi’ this, or ‘independent’ that.
Address by Attorney General Edwin Meese III, Federal Bar Association, Detroit, Mich. (Sept. 13, 1985). The Justice Department took a similar position in litigation over the constitutionality of the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act. See Brief for United States at 44-51, Bowsher v. Synar, 106 S. Ct. 3181 (1986) (No. 85-1377).
What did the founding fathers say about autonomy in operations (autonomous governance.)?
The framers of our Constitution warned that if legislative power were combined with executive power, or if legislative power were combined with judicial power, our republic would become an oligarchy and the rights of the people would be sacrificed to achieve the selfish ends of those who govern.
Madison wrote, “(the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judicial, in the same hands, whether of one , few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elected, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” Typically of the Federalists who advocated ratification of the Constitution, Alexander Hamilton explained that the separation of powers was “itself, in every rational sense, and to every useful purpose, A BILL OF RIGHTS.” It would deny a single department autonomous governance. It would keep abuse of power in check by humbling those in government with the need to satisfy the dictates of competing power centers.
What does quasi-governmental agencies have to do with Privatization of the Federal Government?
Report for Congress Order Code RL33777
Privatization and the Federal Government
Quasi governmental entities may be viewed as a form of privatization because they are substitutes for fully governmental agencies. They are private vehicles for achieving a governmentally declared good. Policymakers have been attracted to quasi governmental entities for a number of reasons, including the popular perception that the private sector is more efficient than government and budgetary constraints (i.e., quasi governmental entities usually are off-budget.)
Accountability
Government agencies, unlike private firms, usually operate under complex accountability hierarchies that include multiple and even conflicting goals. Federal agencies, for example, are subject to the corpus of federal management laws. These laws serve as means for keeping executive branch agencies accountable to Congress, the President, and the public.95 They also embody principles of democratic justice, such as the allowance for public participation and government transparency. To name just a few, the general management laws include the following:
! the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), which provides persons the right to
request information about government operations;
! the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.), which prescribes the process
for agency rulemaking (i.e., interpretation and operationalization of law) , public
participation in this process, and judicial review of rules; and
! the Government in Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)), which requires agencies to hold
open meetings and provide public notice thereof.
Thus, in shifting an activity from the governmental to the private sector, the nature of government oversight is transformed.96 As the components of government provision of goods and services are privatized, the jurisdiction of federal management laws, Congress, the President, and the courts is reduced.
Moreover, privatization shifts government administrative management from implementation to oversight as hierarchical oversight may be replaced by contractual relationships. Government oversight of privatized government activities, or “third- party government,” on a large scale is a recent phenomenon and one that many federal administrators and public administration scholars have found vexatious.97
Finally, the entire question — “What constitutes governmental action and what constitutes private action?” — becomes ambiguous when activities once carried out by officers of the federal government are replaced by private persons. The Constitution requires “all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, [to] be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support [the] Constitution.” (Article IV, Cl. 3) Contractor and subcontractors, though, need not take such an oath….
_____________________________________________________________________________
***The federal reserve banks are independent quasi -governmental agencies***
The Federal Reserve Banks are not Federal instrumentalities (agencies) of the Government, instead they are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations.
Why did Congress want the Federal Reserve to be relatively independent?
The intent of Congress in shaping the Federal Reserve Act was to keep politics out of monetary policy. The System is independent of other branches and agencies of government. It is self-financed and therefore is not subject to the congressional budgetary process.
Several recent Supreme Court separations of powers decisions have noted that there are three, and only three, distinct branches of government; ‘independent’ agencies, therefore, either are in one of the three branches or they are unconstitutional. See Symposium on Administrative Law, The Uneasy Constitutional Status of Administrative Agencies, 36 AM. U.L. REV. 276 (forthcoming 1987) (discussing, inter alia, INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, 951-52, 953 n.16 (1983); Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 (1982) (plurality opinion); Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 118-41 (1976) (per curiam)); see also Note, Incorporation of Executive Agencies into the Executive Branch, 94 YALE L.J. 1766 (1985). Of course, this is not a new concern. See, e.g., 1 K. DAVIS, supra note 2, § 2.7.
Congress in their almighty wisdom has failed to understand that by their creation of quasi-governmental independent agencies they have inadvertently unconstitutionally granted non governmental organizations (NGO’s) co-equal legislative and/or judicial authority to create laws for this country and/or the authority to review and enforce them.
_____________________________________________________________________________
When congress created quasi-governmental agencies (corporations) did they create a new, creative management era, which allowed them to go beyond the rule of law? Absolutely
A Private Federal Corporation (PFC), also known as a Federal Government Corporation (FGC), is a corporation which has been established by the Federal Government. There are, of course, benefits to this, not the least of which would be the disbursement and management of funding by the corporation that would not be subject to Congressional oversight or monitoring. An additional benefit would be autonomy in operations.
Independent Agencies and Government Corporations
Independent establishments are created by Congress to address concerns that go beyond the scope of ordinary legislation. These agencies are responsible for keeping the government and economy running smoothly. (Re: USA.gov)
What is the definition of legislation?
dictionary.com defines “legislation” as:
1. the act of making or enacting laws.
2. a law or a body of laws enacted.
This raises the question, where did Congress get the lawful authority to create independent agencies and/or government corporations that go beyond the scope of the (law) ordinary legislation.
REMEMBER
What the founding fathers said about autonomy in operations (autonomous governance.)
“…Alexander Hamilton explained that the separation of powers was “itself, in every rational sense, and to every useful purpose, A BILL OF RIGHTS.” It would deny a single department autonomous governance. It would keep abuse of power in check by humbling those in government with the need to satisfy the dictates of competing power centers.”
Excellent article….hits nail on head. This reflects the globalist plan.
Hey Eugene, I’d like your “rocket science” mind to try and comprehend my pdf. I’m thinking that the Constitution is really a lot like rocket science and that is why most people just don’t get it!
Thanks for your time,
Zeke
http://powerpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Power-Politics-E-Book-II-An-Equitable-Remedy.pdf
I approve of your declaration of intent with one particular exception. Free trade as in a free market is not the way to go, equal trade with equal benefit for every partner is the rational way to go. Have you heard of Lyndon H. Larouche? If you don’t, you should inquire about his philosophy and his political actions toward the re-enactement of Glass-Steagall. Webster Griffin Tarpley also wrote “Against Oligarchy” which is available online, and he is also acquainted with Larouche. Peter Joseph is also another activist worth noticing, a rising star.
At the end, we are here all for the same fight, aren’t we? Prometheus for the emancipation of mankind against Zeus, the evil despot.
V.
Hi, Eugene;
I am a Congressman with the Republic of the united states of America.
You might be interested to know that the Original Organic Republic of the united states of America has be re-inhabited. We have 135 countries in the process of recognizing us as the true government of the united states.
The DeFacto is just an impostor government. We are the real American Government of the People.
Check out our info.
http://www.republicoftheunitedstates.org
http://www.republicfornevada.org
All 50 State Republics are formed and function.
You can find your state at: http://www.republicoftheunitedstates.org
If, anyone has questions you can reach me at: m.gardner@republicoftheunitedstates.org
Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum are not on the ballots for states that have a total of 564 delegates up for grabs. So would a math wiz care to explain how they could possibly win the nomination?